Mayflower District Court
#bellco-credit-union-et-al-v-thebenburnley
This is the start of #bellco-credit-union-et-al-v-thebenburnley channel.
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-05 03:57 p.m.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:02 p.m.
Brenda 2025-05-05 03:58 p.m.@meowiitten
meowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-05 03:59 p.m. @meowiitten has added @ian to the case channel.
Case Modified
meowiitten 2025-05-05 03:59 p.m.@ian Where's the Complaint?
meowiitten 2025-05-05 03:59 p.m.
Can you send all the materials here
meowiitten 2025-05-05 04:00 p.m.
PDF
sadoimpacto
ian 2025-05-05 04:00 p.m.
Petition for TRO
ian 2025-05-05 04:01 p.m.
channel is named correctly, there are 3 petitioners and 1 respondent so et al should be on the left
meowiitten 2025-05-05 04:03 p.m.
So you're not filing a complaint?
meowiitten 2025-05-05 04:03 p.m.@ian
ian 2025-05-05 04:04 p.m.
No
ian 2025-05-05 04:04 p.m.
We're not required to
ianWe're not required to
meowiitten 2025-05-05 04:04 p.m.
Under what...?
ian 2025-05-05 04:05 p.m.
This court has previously accepted a petition for a TRO before without a complaint
ian 2025-05-05 04:05 p.m.
We will file a complaint later but this goes first
ianWe will file a complaint later but this goes first
meowiitten 2025-05-05 04:05 p.m.
No this does not "go first"
meowiitten 2025-05-05 04:06 p.m.
I can't offer any relief for your petition (it should be a motion for a TRO not a petition) without an underlying complaint
sadoimpactoI can't offer any relief for your petition (it should be a motion for a TRO not a petition) without an underlying complaint
ian 2025-05-05 04:07 p.m.
Ok, I'll file a complaint today, no later than 24hrs
ian 2025-05-05 04:07 p.m.
is that good
meowiitten 2025-05-05 04:08 p.m.
Yes
ianmeowiitten 2025-05-05 04:08 p.m.
And restyle this as a motion
ian 2025-05-05 04:08 p.m.
I'll do that too when I submit the complaint
ian 2025-05-05 07:27 p.m.@meowiitten complaint https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wLHXerPqgN9grM_NC8-RGL6k_l-P8iXv/view?usp=sharing
ianmeowiitten 2025-05-05 07:36 p.m.
Is this Robux that was deposited “into the group” or Clark cash?
sadoimpactoIs this Robux that was deposited “into the group” or Clark cash?
ian 2025-05-05 07:36 p.m.
Clark cash, in all instances
ian 2025-05-05 07:37 p.m.
I doubt this court has jurisdiction to review Robux transactions
meowiitten 2025-05-05 07:37 p.m.
Right
ianClark cash, in all instances
meowiitten 2025-05-05 07:41 p.m.
So you want an order stopping him from losing the funds that you purport he possess?
meowiitten 2025-05-05 07:41 p.m.
That’s the basis of the TRO
sadoimpactoSo you want an order stopping him from losing the funds that you purport he possess?
ian 2025-05-05 07:41 p.m.
Yes we want the assets freezed
ian 2025-05-05 07:41 p.m.
they cant be moved out of his account
ianYes we want the assets freezed
meowiitten 2025-05-05 07:42 p.m.
What was the sum of the assets?
ian 2025-05-05 07:43 p.m.
one sec
sadoimpactoWhat was the sum of the assets?
ian 2025-05-05 08:13 p.m.
It's at least $1,835,000 UCD
ian 2025-05-05 08:13 p.m.
There's some that's unaccounted for though
ian 2025-05-05 08:13 p.m.
We don't know exactly because Defendant should also have transferred records over to Plaintiff and didn't
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:35 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) is an extraordinary equitable remedy granted to preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable harm prior to a full adjudication. Under the standard articulated in Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council , 555 U.S. 7 (2008), the Court must find that (1) Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits, (2) they will suffer irreparable harm without relief, (3) the balance of equities tips in their favor, and (4) an injunction is in the public interest. Having reviewed the emergency motion and supporting exhibits, and finding that all four elements are met—particularly that irreparable harm to Plaintiffs’ business reputation and the potential dissipation of client assets are imminent and unrecoverable by ordinary legal remedy—the Court hereby GRANTS the Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Defendant is hereby ORDERED to preserve and maintain in their current form all assets, funds, and property of any kind that are or may be traceable to Bellco Credit Union, Clark Financial, or their clients, and is ENJOINED from transferring, dissipating, concealing, or otherwise disposing of said assets, pending further order of this Court. This Order shall remain in effect for fourteen (14) days, or until further hearing. District Judge sadoimpacto (Entered: 05/05/2025)
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:02 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:38 p.m.
Actually let me revise that
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:39 p.m.@ian Can you send him the invite link to the Discord and send proof. That will not count as summons
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:39 p.m.
I have to do it by the bot
sadoimpactoian 2025-05-05 08:39 p.m.
He has a lawyer so ill send it to him
ianHe has a lawyer so ill send it to him
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:41 p.m.
Who is the lawyer
ian 2025-05-05 08:42 p.m.
Sinz
ian 2025-05-05 08:42 p.m.
Just the judge
meowiitten used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-05 08:43 p.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @sinz (edited)
meowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-05 08:43 p.m. @meowiitten has added @sinz to the case channel.
Case Modified
ian 2025-05-05 08:43 p.m. 
ian 2025-05-05 08:43 p.m.
Proof
BotclerkFlowmeowiitten 2025-05-05 08:43 p.m.
Due to Discord limitations I can't summon the defendant, but I will count this as process for him as well
ian 2025-05-05 08:44 p.m.
Ok cool beans
ian 2025-05-05 08:44 p.m.
Thank you judge I will watch avengers now.
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:47 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 37(a) of the Mayflower Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Defendant shall have five (5) days from the date of service of the summons and complaint to serve an answer or file any responsive pleading or paper herein. Failure to do so will result in the Clerk being authorized to enter default upon request by the Plaintiffs, without further notice. District Judge sadoimpacto (Entered: 05/05/2025)
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:02 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:47 p.m.PAPERLESS SCHEDULING ORDER: Pursuant to the Temporary Restraining Order entered on May 5, 2025, the Court hereby SETS a hearing on Plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction for Monday, May 12, 2025, at 10:00 AM Eastern Time, to be conducted continously and asynchronously. Defendant is ORDERED to appear and show cause why the Temporary Restraining Order should not be converted into a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of the TRO and this Scheduling Order on Defendant no later than Wednesday, May 7, 2025, and file proof of service. Any written opposition by Defendant shall be filed no later than Friday, May 9, 2025, at 5:00 PM Eastern Time, with optional reply by Plaintiffs due Sunday, May 11, 2025, at 5:00 PM Eastern Time. No continuances will be granted absent extraordinary cause. District Judge sadoimpacto (Entered: 05/05/2025)
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:02 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:48 p.m.@ian @sinz All orders pinned!
ian 2025-05-05 08:53 p.m.
Proof of service
ian 2025-05-05 08:53 p.m.
Idk why it looks so ass
sadoimpactoian 2025-05-05 08:53 p.m.
Am I to understand counsel for Plaintiff will not be allowed at the hearing
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:54 p.m.
They will be
ian 2025-05-05 08:54 p.m.
I have school at that time, it's a weekday
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:55 p.m.
Continuously and asynchronously means it goes on for as long as is needed
meowiitten 2025-05-05 08:55 p.m.
It takes place on Discord
ian 2025-05-05 08:55 p.m.
Oh didnt see that
ian 2025-05-05 08:55 p.m.
Great nothing from me then
ian 2025-05-05 08:55 p.m.
See you
meowiitten 2025-05-05 09:02 p.m.@ian My clerk informed me that TheBenBurnley was banned
meowiitten 2025-05-05 09:02 p.m.
I'd probably contact the developers because whatever money he has, you're never getting it
meowiitten Server2025-05-05 09:03 p.m.
sadoimpactoian 2025-05-05 09:21 p.m.
Uh oh
ian 2025-05-05 09:22 p.m.
Come on man its always something
ian 2025-05-05 09:22 p.m.
Isth
ian 2025-05-05 09:26 p.m.@meowiitten he's not unionware banned, he's discord banned
ian 2025-05-05 09:26 p.m.
So perhaps we can continue the proceedings and get default?
ian 2025-05-05 09:27 p.m.
So that if he gets unbanned at some point though unlikely because he doxxed someone
ian 2025-05-05 09:27 p.m.
We get our rightful money
ian 2025-05-06 06:23 a.m.
Message by thebenburnley in a thread for the record
@meowiitten Your honor, I am banned on my alt account due to an investigation thats happened to several people. So I am not allowed to play on my main due to the game rules, & have been informed if I am caught playing on my main, that is ban evading, & I will be banned as such
ian 2025-05-06 06:24 a.m.@shy- I'm not an officer of the court but I am opposing counsel and I'd like you to follow the rules of the chamber. You can't just make threads, if you want to address the court you have to be added and talk here
ian 2025-05-06 06:25 a.m.
Your honor (I've already pinged) it is apparent thebenburnley is still in the community and as such we can continue the proceedings
meowiitten used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-06 11:07 a.m. @meowiitten has added @shy- to the case channel.
Case Modified
ian 2025-05-06 12:51 p.m.@meowiitten add @sinz counsel for defendant
ian 2025-05-06 12:51 p.m.
Is the scheduling order still binding
sinz 2025-05-06 12:51 p.m.
im already added
ianIs the scheduling order still binding
sinz 2025-05-06 12:52 p.m.
id like to know this as well
sinzim already added
ian 2025-05-06 12:52 p.m.
Didnt see
ianIs the scheduling order still binding
meowiitten 2025-05-06 12:53 p.m.
Yes of course
meowiitten 2025-05-06 12:53 p.m.
5 days to answer the complaint, 6 days until the hearing
sadoimpacto5 days to answer the complaint, 6 days until the hearing
sinz 2025-05-06 12:54 p.m.
for the hearing
sinz 2025-05-06 12:54 p.m.
what would the preliminary injunction do? @meowiitten
sinz 2025-05-06 12:54 p.m.
the same exact thing as the tro?
sinz 2025-05-06 12:55 p.m.
or is it just to determine whether the TRO will remain or not
ian 2025-05-06 12:56 p.m.@sinz
ian 2025-05-06 12:56 p.m.
Preliminary injunction would do the same as a TRO
ian 2025-05-06 12:56 p.m.
It has to become a preliminary injunction if it's extended though
ian 2025-05-06 12:57 p.m.
TROs last less than prelim injcs and are used before them
ian 2025-05-06 12:58 p.m.
Dont delete messages bro
ian 2025-05-06 12:58 p.m.
No at trial it's decided if he's liable
ian 2025-05-06 12:58 p.m.
But you prob know that since you deleted the message
meowiitten 2025-05-06 12:59 p.m.
A PI is permanent
meowiitten 2025-05-06 12:59 p.m.
A TRO is temporary
sadoimpactoA PI is permanent
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:00 p.m.
Until the case ends
sadoimpactoA PI is permanent
ian 2025-05-06 01:00 p.m.
Until the trial ends
ian 2025-05-06 01:00 p.m.
Yea cool beans
sadoimpactoUntil the case ends
sinz 2025-05-06 01:03 p.m.
gotcha
sinzgotcha
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:07 p.m.
Though, I don’t know why you’d want to oppose the PI unless you know something I don’t about the facts surrounding this case
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:08 p.m.
It’s basically just an instruction telling him not to extort and convert the Plaintiff’s money
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:08 p.m.@ian Can I ask how is Clark Financial involved in this? Were they part of the merger?
sinz 2025-05-06 01:08 p.m.
i was just about to bring that up
sinz 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
shouldnt the clark financial thing be a separate case
sinz 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
i dont see how it's relevant
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
They can be discharged as a plaintiff but I want to hear this from him
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:09 p.m.
It didn’t seem like they suffered any injury
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:10 p.m.
No alleged injury
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:10 p.m.
In the complaint
sinz 2025-05-06 01:11 p.m.
i think he alleged slander
sinz 2025-05-06 01:11 p.m.
may be wrong but ya
sinzi think he alleged slander
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:12 p.m.
You can motion to sever the claim of plaintiff Clark financial
sinz 2025-05-06 01:13 p.m.@ian do you care to willfully withdraw them?
ian 2025-05-06 01:20 p.m.
No
sadoimpactoian 2025-05-06 01:20 p.m.
Yes
ian 2025-05-06 01:21 p.m.
Clark Financial and Bellco Credit Union merged to Bellco-Clark Financial Group
ian 2025-05-06 01:21 p.m.
The reason they're both suing and not BCFG is because BCFG is not actually recognized by DOS for some reason
ian 2025-05-06 01:21 p.m.
Instead bellco and clark are recognized separately, just that bellco is listed as owned by clark financial
ian 2025-05-06 01:21 p.m.
Weird stuff but I didnt decide it
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:22 p.m.
So all of these claims are brought by all 3 plaintiffs
ian 2025-05-06 01:24 p.m.
Bellco and clark are actually one entity
ian 2025-05-06 01:24 p.m.
But DOS didnt care to format it like that on their trello so we're obligated to proceed like this
ianClark Financial and Bellco Credit Union merged to Bellco-Clark Financial Group
sinz 2025-05-06 01:24 p.m.
since when
sinzsince when
ian 2025-05-06 01:25 p.m.
Since the merger
ian 2025-05-06 01:25 p.m.
Did you read the complaint
ian 2025-05-06 01:25 p.m.
You shouldn't be asking the court to sever if you didnt read the complaint
sinz 2025-05-06 01:26 p.m.
the complaint does not specify when the merger happened
ian 2025-05-06 01:27 p.m.
Doesnt it
ian 2025-05-06 01:27 p.m.
If thats the case I guess you just wont know when it happened
ian 2025-05-06 01:27 p.m.
Im not going to provide you help unless Im obligated to or it actually benefits us
sinz 2025-05-06 01:28 p.m.
okay motion to server CF incoming
ian 2025-05-06 01:29 p.m.
Ok
sadoimpactoSo all of these claims are brought by all 3 plaintiffs
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:29 p.m.@ian
ian 2025-05-06 01:29 p.m.
Yes
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:30 p.m.
Ok then
ian 2025-05-06 01:32 p.m.
Order incoming 
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:33 p.m.@ian So if all went correctly, would it be two parts to one whole: CF and BCU; or CF becomes BCU
ian 2025-05-06 01:34 p.m.
I think the former but let me check the merger agmt
sinz 2025-05-06 01:40 p.m.
btw just to inform the court @meowiitten @ian
sinz 2025-05-06 01:40 p.m.
defendant is BANNED from clark
sinz 2025-05-06 01:40 p.m.
this is moot
sinzdefendant is BANNED from clark
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:41 p.m.
Can you find the ban log
sinz 2025-05-06 01:41 p.m.
there isnt a ban log
sinz 2025-05-06 01:41 p.m.
from what ive seen
ian 2025-05-06 01:41 p.m.
How can you prove he's banned then
ian 2025-05-06 01:41 p.m.
Defendant himself literally said he is not banned, his alt is
sinz 2025-05-06 01:41 p.m. 
ian 2025-05-06 01:42 p.m.
It makes it moot if we were suing his alt
sinz 2025-05-06 01:42 p.m.
well it's moot because it's un-justiciable
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:42 p.m.@krabz
sinz 2025-05-06 01:42 p.m.
he cannot pay you or give you what you're asking for
sinz 2025-05-06 01:42 p.m.
even if you win
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:42 p.m.
Is @shy- banned @krabz
sinzhe cannot pay you or give you what you're asking for
ian 2025-05-06 01:42 p.m.
He is present and is able to take part
sinz 2025-05-06 01:42 p.m.
present or not he cannot pay you
sinz 2025-05-06 01:43 p.m.
so there is nothing you get from this case even if you win
sinzpresent or not he cannot pay you
ian 2025-05-06 01:43 p.m.
Whether he can pay us or not in the far future based on a complicated scenario should not hinder this court's ability to impose jurisdiction upon him
sinzso there is nothing you get from this case even if you win
ian 2025-05-06 01:43 p.m.
We're still going through with it
sadoimpactoIs @shy- banned @krabz
shy- 2025-05-06 01:43 p.m.
when i attempt to play i get the error code because my alt Evan_BuckIey is banned due to an investigation. many players were banned as well. i am unable to play due to the fact i get the error code + even if i could bypass it i would be banned for ban evasion.
ian 2025-05-06 01:44 p.m.
So you arent banned
ian 2025-05-06 01:44 p.m.
You're unable to play
ian 2025-05-06 01:44 p.m.
Nowhere in anywhere does it say we can't sue you
ianWe're still going through with it
sinz 2025-05-06 01:44 p.m.
if a case is "non- justiciable," then the court cannot hear it
ian 2025-05-06 01:44 p.m.
I hardly think it's non-justiciable
ian 2025-05-06 01:44 p.m.@shy- do you plan to play in the future
ian 2025-05-06 01:44 p.m.
At all
ian 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
I presume yes because you're literally here
ian 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
For lego court
ian 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
So you must likely try to appeal or overrule the ban not on your accountin some way soon
ian 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
account in *
sinz 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
the fact is
sinz 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
he's banned
ian 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
he is not
sinz 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
there is no due date
ian 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
His alt is banned it's different
sinz 2025-05-06 01:45 p.m.
for his ban to be removed
sinz 2025-05-06 01:46 p.m.
the court has to go off what is actually occurring not hypotheticals(edited)
ian 2025-05-06 01:46 p.m.
Can we establish it's not his ban it's his alt's ban
ian 2025-05-06 01:46 p.m.
It's different
ian 2025-05-06 01:46 p.m.
He's not actually banned he just can't play because his alt is and it'd be evasion
ian 2025-05-06 01:46 p.m.
The circumstances are blurry
ian 2025-05-06 01:46 p.m.
At times like these we are afforded the benefit of the doubt NOT you
ian 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
You need cause for the suit to be dropped and you cant provide it
sinz 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
his alt being banned is the same as him being banned
sinz 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
there is no difference
ian 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
It's not
sinz 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
a ban on his alt is a ban on his main
sinz 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
because it has the same effect
sinz 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
he is BANNED from playing the game
sinz 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
alt or main
ian 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
A ban on his alt is a you-can't-join-or-be-banned
ian 2025-05-06 01:47 p.m.
It's not a ban on him
sinzhe is BANNED from playing the game
ian 2025-05-06 01:48 p.m.
his alt is and we're not suing his alt
sinz 2025-05-06 01:48 p.m.
it's against the community rules and the court cannot allow it
ian 2025-05-06 01:48 p.m.@meowiitten the circumstances are blurry. Simple as that. If he wants it dismissed we request a paper motion to which we can reply to
ian 2025-05-06 01:48 p.m.
This is a matter of law not moderation
meowiitten 2025-05-06 01:48 p.m.
Reach out to a moderator and confirm if his main account is banned
sadoimpactoReach out to a moderator and confirm if his main account is banned
ian 2025-05-06 01:49 p.m.
He said himself it's not your honor
ian 2025-05-06 01:49 p.m.
His alt is
ian 2025-05-06 01:49 p.m.
You can see the provided screenshots
sinz 2025-05-06 01:49 p.m.
he is not banned on his main he is banned on his alt but due to community rules he is not allowed to play on his main, a ban on his alt is thus a ban on his main @meowiitten (edited)
sinz 2025-05-06 01:49 p.m.
and this is despite the fact that the game will not physically let him play
sinz 2025-05-06 01:50 p.m.
because of roblox anti-alt ban detection thing
sinzhe is not banned on his main he is banned on his alt but due to community rules he is not allowed to play on his main, a ban on his alt is thus a ban on his main <@6918433429752382...(edited)
ian 2025-05-06 01:50 p.m.
It's not a ban on his main
ian 2025-05-06 01:50 p.m.
Stop editing messages
ian 2025-05-06 01:50 p.m.@meowiitten we ask the defense counsel be held in contempt or other penalty for altering the court record repeatedly
sinz 2025-05-06 01:51 p.m.
put it in paper
sinz 2025-05-06 01:51 p.m.
i was fixing a typo so the court would understand
ian 2025-05-06 01:51 p.m.
Doesnt matter
ian 2025-05-06 01:51 p.m.
Not allowed
sinzput it in paper
ian 2025-05-06 01:52 p.m.
I will if the judge asks me to
sinz 2025-05-06 01:52 p.m.
why do lawyers resort to contempt demands, that is not going to save ur case
ian 2025-05-06 01:52 p.m.
Our case does not need to be "saved", counselor, but yours clearly does since you're desperately trying to claim your client is banned
sinz 2025-05-06 01:53 p.m.@meowiitten will the court take judicial notice that the defendant cannot physically play the game and because he is banned from his alt he is banned from playing on his main
sinz 2025-05-06 01:53 p.m.
sinz 2025-05-06 01:53 p.m.
ian 2025-05-06 01:53 p.m.
Ive seen people here not have a computer anymore and the trial continued and they defaulted
ian 2025-05-06 01:54 p.m.
Why? Because the only scenario in which it can be dismissed is if the defendant himself is banned from the game and that can be corroborated
ian 2025-05-06 01:54 p.m.
That is not the case
ian 2025-05-06 01:55 p.m.
We ask your honor to request defense counsel put his motion in paper as it is a matter of law and NOT moderation
ian 2025-05-06 01:55 p.m.
Respectfully
sinzmeowiitten 2025-05-06 02:00 p.m.
I’d have to see proof that his main was banned as well
sadoimpactoI’d have to see proof that his main was banned as well
sinz 2025-05-06 02:01 p.m. 
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:01 p.m.
Like a log
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:01 p.m.
Or talk to an admin
sadoimpactoOr talk to an admin
sinz 2025-05-06 02:01 p.m.
sadoimpactoLike a log
ian 2025-05-06 02:01 p.m.
it's not banned
sinz 2025-05-06 02:01 p.m. 
ian 2025-05-06 02:02 p.m.
he can't join because his alt is banned which means his main cannot join
ian 2025-05-06 02:02 p.m.
Can you stop clogging the chat with screenshots
ian 2025-05-06 02:02 p.m.
we get it
ian 2025-05-06 02:02 p.m.
But still
ian 2025-05-06 02:02 p.m.
His main is not banned which means there is no regulations that says this claim must be dismissed and as such we refuse to drop
ian 2025-05-06 02:02 p.m.
Whether he is able to pay us is something the court should consider after trial—not now
ian 2025-05-06 02:03 p.m.
again this is a matter of law, not moderation, and as such we request he be asked to submit a paper motion in support
sinzClick to see attachment.
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:08 p.m.
Can you stop
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:08 p.m.
I asked you for something very specific
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:08 p.m.
Which was definitive proof his main was banned, not the implication
sinz 2025-05-06 02:08 p.m.
your honor a ban on his main makes no different he cannot play the game
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:09 p.m.
I’m sure he can evade that with a VPN or by going on another computer
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:09 p.m.
Very easy to do that
sinz 2025-05-06 02:09 p.m.
no he cant it's against the community rules
sinz 2025-05-06 02:09 p.m. 
sinz 2025-05-06 02:09 p.m.
the court cant have him do something that will result in a permanent ban
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:10 p.m.
He doesn’t have to tell them if he uses a VPN… like he could just go in game, spend all his money, and then get banned
sinz 2025-05-06 02:10 p.m.
that's just hypothetical there's no telling if that would even work roblox has seriously upped their security since the byron security update
sinz 2025-05-06 02:11 p.m.
either way he's not breaking the rules
ian 2025-05-06 02:12 p.m.
response soon
sinzthat's just hypothetical there's no telling if that would even work roblox has seriously upped their security since the byron security update
ian 2025-05-06 02:12 p.m.
bruh
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:13 p.m.
Byron security
ianbruh
sinz 2025-05-06 02:13 p.m.
what
sinz 2025-05-06 02:13 p.m.
it eliminated like all the top exploits
ian 2025-05-06 02:15 p.m.
i play doomspire brickbattle everyday and see exploiters so clearly youre lying
sinz 2025-05-06 02:15 p.m.
probably a skill issue ngl
iani play doomspire brickbattle everyday and see exploiters so clearly youre lying
shy- 2025-05-06 02:15 p.m.
thats happymod
shy- 2025-05-06 02:16 p.m.
android exploits
ian 2025-05-06 02:16 p.m.
the exploiters play on android?
ian 2025-05-06 02:16 p.m.
damn
sinzprobably a skill issue ngl
ian 2025-05-06 02:16 p.m.
no i assure you im very good
ian 2025-05-06 02:16 p.m.
if you want we can 1v1
ianthe exploiters play on android?
shy- 2025-05-06 02:17 p.m.
i think thats how all the pc players did it for a while
shy- 2025-05-06 02:17 p.m.
was use an emulator
ianif you want we can 1v1
sinz 2025-05-06 02:17 p.m.
if i win you dismiss this easy
ian 2025-05-06 02:19 p.m.
if i win you settle for what we asked
sinz 2025-05-06 02:20 p.m.
tempting offer
sinz 2025-05-06 02:20 p.m.
however my client is banned so he cannot pay even if u win
sadoimpactoIs @shy- banned @krabz
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-05-06 02:26 p.m.
Yes - but this may be resolved in the coming days (we are waiting on some statements from other people)
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-05-06 02:27 p.m.
That is, the permanent nature of the ban is not set in stone
krabzatonin ᴏᴍYes - but this may be resolved in the coming days (we are waiting on some statements from other people)
shy- 2025-05-06 02:28 p.m.
thank you krab
krabzatonin ᴏᴍThat is, the permanent nature of the ban is not set in stone
ian 2025-05-06 02:35 p.m.
“A case becomes moot when the issues presented are no longer “live” or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome [...]." Castillo v. Gillen
ian 2025-05-06 02:35 p.m.
Castillo is not applicable here on its own
ian 2025-05-06 02:36 p.m.
This means the issues are live
ian 2025-05-06 02:36 p.m.
and we don't lack a legally cognizable interest
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:36 p.m.
Listen he doesn’t gaf about the legal issue he’s here to answer the question of moderation
meowiitten 2025-05-06 02:36 p.m.
Lol
sinz 2025-05-06 02:36 p.m.
sadoimpactoListen he doesn’t gaf about the legal issue he’s here to answer the question of moderation
ian 2025-05-06 02:38 p.m.
I know
ian 2025-05-06 02:40 p.m.
response to brief incoming
sinzian 2025-05-06 02:42 p.m.
File it in website pls if you havent already
ian 2025-05-06 02:42 p.m.
so mine doesnt show up before yours
sinz 2025-05-06 02:47 p.m.
ill lyk once filed
sinz 2025-05-06 02:47 p.m.
for now just submit ur response in the chat
ian 2025-05-06 03:24 p.m.
im having one hell of a ride finding 881 F. Supp. 2d 226 bruh
sinz 2025-05-06 03:27 p.m.
probably need a better caselaw finder
sinz 2025-05-06 03:28 p.m.
cheap ones probably cant find it
ian 2025-05-06 03:55 p.m.PLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO DEFENSE'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Cc@sinz @meowiitten
courtesy link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TzUNfByy3eupRqKi2Jsrmy7s3qdAFbU3/view?usp=sharing
sinz 2025-05-06 03:59 p.m.
as of now defendant is banned with no date for unban there is not redressability this court could offer to plaintiff as such there is no case or controversy before the court and the case should be dismissed
sinz 2025-05-06 04:00 p.m.
there is no redressability*
sinzas of now defendant is banned with no date for unban there is not redressability this court could offer to plaintiff as such there is no case or controversy before the court and th...
ian 2025-05-06 04:02 p.m.
Actually there is
ian 2025-05-06 04:02 p.m.
We ask for declaratory relief in our complaint
ian 2025-05-06 04:02 p.m.
He can issue that
ian 2025-05-06 04:02 p.m.
So...............
sinz 2025-05-06 04:03 p.m.
and evne if there is we'd ask the court to dismiss all claims where there is want for in-game compensation of some sort
ian 2025-05-06 04:04 p.m.
Should've put the case law that an ask of ingame compensation is required—which doesnt exist—in your brief but you didnt so lets not keep talking here mindlessly and just wait for the judge to rule
sinz 2025-05-06 04:05 p.m.
i dont understand what you're saying but yes we will wait for judge
ian 2025-05-06 04:06 p.m.@meowiitten pls rule
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:07 p.m.
I'm waiting to hear if his main is banned
sadoimpactoI'm waiting to hear if his main is banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:08 p.m.
Kraz already said yes?
krabzatonin ᴏᴍYes - but this may be resolved in the coming days (we are waiting on some statements from other people)
shy- 2025-05-06 04:08 p.m.
^
sadoimpactoI'm waiting to hear if his main is banned
ian 2025-05-06 04:08 p.m.
No
ian 2025-05-06 04:08 p.m.
It's not
ian 2025-05-06 04:08 p.m.
He can't play but he isn't actually banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:08 p.m.
a moderator confirmed he is banned
ian 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.@shy- is your main banned by moderation action
ian 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.
Not indirectly
ian 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.
Is it directly banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.
the mod said he is banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.
dont ask my client silly questions
shy- 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.@krabz please assist
sinz 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.
he is represented by a lawyer
sinzthe mod said he is banned
ian 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.
Your client said he isnt
sinz 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.
if you want to talk to him you speak to me
ian 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.
You're present
ian 2025-05-06 04:09 p.m.
I can talk to him
sinz 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
doesnt matter
sinz 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
no you cant
ian 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
Yeah I can
sinz 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
if you continue ill have to file an ethics report
sinz 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
you are not allowed to directly speak to someone who is represented by a lawyer
shy-when i attempt to play i get the error code because my alt Evan_BuckIey is banned due to an investigation. many players were banned as well. i am unable to play due to the fact i g...
ian 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
^
sinzyou are not allowed to directly speak to someone who is represented by a lawyer
ian 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
You're literally present I am
sadoimpactoIs @shy- banned @krabz
shy- 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
^
sinz 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
it doesnt matter
krabzatonin ᴏᴍYes - but this may be resolved in the coming days (we are waiting on some statements from other people)
shy- 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
^
sinz 2025-05-06 04:10 p.m.
stop asking my client questions
sinzit doesnt matter
ian 2025-05-06 04:11 p.m.
File the ethics report if you want
ian 2025-05-06 04:11 p.m.@krabz is thebenburley's MAIN account DIRECTLY banned in the game by moderation action (not by implications of a different account being banned and such)???
iansinz 2025-05-06 04:12 p.m.
you arent the judge and that isnt what the judge asked
sinz 2025-05-06 04:12 p.m.
kraz confirmed he is banned
ian 2025-05-06 04:13 p.m.
The judge asked if he is banned
To ban means to officially prohibit
He is notban ned if he hasn't been officially prohibited
To ban means to officially prohibit
He is not
ian 2025-05-06 04:13 p.m.
Im just asking for clarification
ian 2025-05-06 04:13 p.m.
Before you say it
sinz 2025-05-06 04:13 p.m.
please stop arguing with a literal moderator
ian 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
A rule preventing him is not official prohibition
sinz 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
how clear does he need to make it to you
sinz 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
he already confirmed he is banned
sinzplease stop arguing with a literal moderator
ian 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
Actually Im arguing with you
sinz 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
idk why
sinz 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
he's banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
end of story
sinzhow clear does he need to make it to you
ian 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
As clear as needed for the process of justice 
sinz 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
confirmed by moderator
ian 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
He clearly didnt mean he's actually banned
sinzend of story
ian 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
It's not
ian 2025-05-06 04:14 p.m.
And youre not a judge
sinz 2025-05-06 04:15 p.m.
im not arguing with u the moderator already confirmed he is banned cc @meowiitten
ian 2025-05-06 04:15 p.m.
Ok then dont argue???
ian 2025-05-06 04:15 p.m.
I asked a question
sinz 2025-05-06 04:15 p.m.
we'll wait for the ruling
ian 2025-05-06 04:15 p.m.
No
ian 2025-05-06 04:15 p.m.
We'll wait for him to confirm
ian 2025-05-06 04:16 p.m.@meowiitten I'm like 98.7386% sure he meant that he cannot play, not that he is banned/community removed, they're two VERY separate things and I think it doesn't hurt literally anyone to ask for further clarification
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:20 p.m.
Well look at it this way
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:20 p.m.
This is important because we treat a ban like abatement due to death
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:20 p.m.
Abatement ab initio
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:20 p.m.
And I want definitive confirmation that he’s banned
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:20 p.m.
If there’s an investigation and he’s cleared and he comes back
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:20 p.m.
He could spend everything
sadoimpactoHe could spend everything
sinz 2025-05-06 04:22 p.m.
I dont think this means anything but my client does not have any money, the plaintiffs claim he has a load of money but they dont have any actual proof of it,
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:22 p.m.
This means nothing to me because he could’ve just transferred it to another person
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:23 p.m.
I won’t go there though
sinz 2025-05-06 04:23 p.m.
fair enough i guess we will have to wait till proof is shown if it gets there
sadoimpactoAnd I want definitive confirmation that he’s banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:24 p.m.
btw what are we looking for exactly
sinz 2025-05-06 04:24 p.m. 
sinz 2025-05-06 04:24 p.m.
this was pretty clear iimo
sadoimpactoThis means nothing to me because he could’ve just transferred it to another person
ian 2025-05-06 04:25 p.m.
Thats what I was thinking yes
ian 2025-05-06 04:25 p.m.
Perhaps in violation of the TRO
ian 2025-05-06 04:26 p.m.
Also besides reinbursement like it literally doesnt matter if hes poor (which I assure you he isnt) he still has to pay for the torts he committed for justice
sinzbtw what are we looking for exactly
ian 2025-05-06 04:26 p.m.
Definite confirmation that he's banned
ian 2025-05-06 04:26 p.m.
"Yes, he is banned directly and not just because of his alt"
ian 2025-05-06 04:26 p.m.
Which wont happen because he isnt
ian 2025-05-06 04:26 p.m.
Your client said it himself
ian 2025-05-06 04:26 p.m.
But we'll see
sinz 2025-05-06 04:26 p.m.
thats not what the judge asked for
sinz 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
please shut up if you are not being talked to
sinz 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
im asking the judge
sinz 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
not you
sinz 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
ian 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
Im the one that asked the question
ian 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
The judge sustained it
ian 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
It's why I'm replying to you
sinz 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
you telling me what HE wants does nothing for me
ian 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
I asked it not him
sinzyou telling me what HE wants does nothing for me
ian 2025-05-06 04:27 p.m.
I asked the question and he sustained it saying it's important for us to know the answer
ian 2025-05-06 04:28 p.m.
I clarified for you
ian 2025-05-06 04:28 p.m.
How does that equate to telling you what he wants
sadoimpactoAnd I want definitive confirmation that he’s banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:29 p.m.
anyways if you can get back to me on what you'd like to know so I can try to acquire it
sinz 2025-05-06 04:29 p.m.
because I thought kraz already answered ur question
ian 2025-05-06 04:29 p.m.doesnt respond
sinzanyways if you can get back to me on what you'd like to know so I can try to acquire it
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:30 p.m.
A log
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:30 p.m.
An actual log
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:31 p.m.
Can he just go in game and get himself banned and get it over with
sinz 2025-05-06 04:31 p.m.
why would that matter when the moderator confirmed to you he is banned
sadoimpactoCan he just go in game and get himself banned and get it over with
ian 2025-05-06 04:31 p.m.
Real
sadoimpactoCan he just go in game and get himself banned and get it over with
sinz 2025-05-06 04:31 p.m.
hes banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:31 p.m.
he cant go in game
sinz 2025-05-06 04:31 p.m.
it wont let him join
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:31 p.m.
Well I’m not seeing a log
sinzit wont let him join
ian 2025-05-06 04:31 p.m.
He is not banned absent a log
sinz 2025-05-06 04:31 p.m.
a log doesnt do anymore more for you when a moderator confirmed to you themselves that he is banned
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
This is like fugitive disentitlement doctrine but with bans
sinz 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
any more for you
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
If you wanna think of it this way
ian 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
That moderator isn't intimately familiar with the issue
ian 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
He might've misunderstood the question
ian 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
I'm typing with one hand rn omg
sadoimpactoThis is like fugitive disentitlement doctrine but with bans
sinz 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
theres no proof whatsoever that he purposely got himself banned
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
So I’m not going to accept any relief he is trying to receive (the MTD) until he surrenders himself to the ban
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
And proves that this case should be dismissed
sinz 2025-05-06 04:32 p.m.
what are you talking about surrenders himself to the ban
sinz 2025-05-06 04:33 p.m.
what does that even mean
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:33 p.m.
Joins the game and gets banned if it’s inevitable
sadoimpactoSo I’m not going to accept any relief he is trying to receive (the MTD) until he surrenders himself to the ban
ian 2025-05-06 04:33 p.m.
This is fucking hilarious if I can say that
sadoimpactoJoins the game and gets banned if it’s inevitable
sinz 2025-05-06 04:34 p.m.
he's already banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:34 p.m.
how can he get banned when he's already banned
ian 2025-05-06 04:34 p.m.
He isnt omg
ian 2025-05-06 04:35 p.m.
Can defense counsel be held in contempt it's painstakingly obvious defendant is not banned
sadoimpactoIf there’s an investigation and he’s cleared and he comes back
sinz 2025-05-06 04:35 p.m.
also the issue with this is he is banned. whether he is unbanned in the future so be in have the plaintiff refile but rn there is no jurisdiction for this case to proceed we cannot stay the case or let it proceed when there is no jurisdiction due to mootness
sinz 2025-05-06 04:36 p.m.
there must be jurisdiction at all points of the case
sinz 2025-05-06 04:36 p.m.
if there is not then the case MUST be dismissed
sinz 2025-05-06 04:36 p.m.
we cannot rely on hypotheticals
sinz 2025-05-06 04:36 p.m.
he is banned kraz confirmed this himself
ian 2025-05-06 04:37 p.m.
I'm not replying because I only have one hand not bc I agree
ian 2025-05-06 04:37 p.m.
I will in a moment
ian 2025-05-06 04:37 p.m.
This steak is succulent
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
What do you not understand about what I’m saying
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
If his main was banned it would log it
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
And say “unionWARE”
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
Banned
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
In the log channel
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
That everyone can see
sinz 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
kraz confirmed he's banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
(a moderator)
ian 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
Omg
ian 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
Bro
sinz 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
which just goes to show you
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
There’s no logggggggggggggguhhhhhhh
sinz 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
you can be banned and not logged
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
L O G
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
THERES NO LOGGGGGGGG
sinz 2025-05-06 04:38 p.m.
A MODERATOR
sinz 2025-05-06 04:39 p.m.
A MODERATOR TOLD U HE IS BANNEDDDD
sinz 2025-05-06 04:39 p.m.
a log doesnt make a difference your honor
ian 2025-05-06 04:39 p.m.
Sado krabz could've misunderstood just as easily as I type with my right hand (im very modest i know)
sinz 2025-05-06 04:39 p.m.
unless you do not believe kraz
sinz 2025-05-06 04:40 p.m.@krabz can we get a log of the ban to clear this up apparently hon sadoimpacto does not believe that he is banned
sinzunless you do not believe kraz
ian 2025-05-06 04:40 p.m.
I believe he might've misunderstood
sinzian 2025-05-06 04:40 p.m.
Logs are public
ian 2025-05-06 04:40 p.m.
There isn't one
sinz 2025-05-06 04:40 p.m.
obviously because it was not generated
sinz 2025-05-06 04:41 p.m.
im asking him to generate one since that is what sado is asking for
sinzobviously because it was not generated
ian 2025-05-06 04:41 p.m.
Because he isn't banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:41 p.m.
kraz said he was
ian 2025-05-06 04:41 p.m.
He misunderstood
sinz 2025-05-06 04:41 p.m.
a believe him over you when it comes to moderation
meowiitten Server2025-05-06 04:41 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:41 p.m.
There’s this for his alt
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:41 p.m.
But not for his main
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:42 p.m.
If he joined the game and was to be automatically banned it would show up that unionWARE banned him upon joining
sinz 2025-05-06 04:42 p.m.
i dont see how you can take notice of that but not this
ian 2025-05-06 04:42 p.m.
Sado can we motion for a preliminary injunction ordering defense counsel to stfu already
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:42 p.m.
Then, if he wants this case dismissed he better join the game and get banned!(edited)
sinz 2025-05-06 04:43 p.m.
ill just wait till kraz confirms (again)
ian 2025-05-06 04:43 p.m.
We don't need him to
ian 2025-05-06 04:43 p.m.
There is no log
ian 2025-05-06 04:43 p.m.
He isn't banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:43 p.m.
kraz said hes banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:43 p.m.
so ur word means nothing
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:44 p.m.
Ughhhhhhhhhhhuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
sinzso ur word means nothing
ian 2025-05-06 04:44 p.m.
Omg bro
ian 2025-05-06 04:44 p.m.
O m g
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:44 p.m.
Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
ian 2025-05-06 04:44 p.m.
Oh em greereeee
ian 2025-05-06 04:44 p.m.
Ge
sinz 2025-05-06 04:46 p.m.@meowiitten 
sinz 2025-05-06 04:46 p.m.
hope this makes you happy
meowiitten Server2025-05-06 04:46 p.m.
ian 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
2 minutes ago???
ian 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
What
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.@sinz What did he do so I can determine if this investigation will be fruitful
ian 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
Fuck
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
And he will actually be banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
what are you talking about actually be banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
he is banned sado
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
Investigative
sinzhe is banned sado
ian 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
Under investigation
sinz 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
yes but still banned
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:47 p.m.
They’re determining whether he should stay banned
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
He could be unbanned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
but he is currently banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
could be but currently banned
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
So he’s in a coma
ian 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
LOL
ian 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
this conversation is so funny
ian 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
Omg
sinz 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
theres no jurisdiction for this case to remain on the docket currently
sinz 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
it should be dismissed
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:48 p.m.
Says NOT ME
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:49 p.m.
Says YOU
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:49 p.m.
The judge
sinz 2025-05-06 04:49 p.m.
im just the judge
sinz 2025-05-06 04:49 p.m.
can you stay this at the very least if you arent going to dismiss it
sinz 2025-05-06 04:49 p.m.
since he is in a "coma" due to his ban
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:49 p.m.
You’re here aren’t you
sinzcan you stay this at the very least if you arent going to dismiss it
ian 2025-05-06 04:49 p.m.
Why
ian 2025-05-06 04:49 p.m.
You're here you can take part
ian 2025-05-06 04:49 p.m.
He's here to
ian 2025-05-06 04:50 p.m.
Too
sinz 2025-05-06 04:50 p.m.
because arguing the case just for him to be banned is a waste of everyones time
sinz 2025-05-06 04:50 p.m.
just for him to be perm banned*
sinz 2025-05-06 04:50 p.m.
hes already banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:50 p.m.
but the court isnt dismissing apparently
ian 2025-05-06 04:50 p.m.
A waste of everyone's time is waiting for him to be unbanned just to start over at a MUCH later date
sinz 2025-05-06 04:51 p.m.@meowiitten what is ur ruling on the motion
sinz 2025-05-06 04:51 p.m.
we have gave u already you asked for
sinz 2025-05-06 04:51 p.m.
kraz confirmed he is banned
sinz 2025-05-06 04:51 p.m.
u asked for a log showing his main is banned
ian 2025-05-06 04:51 p.m.
Investigative
sinz 2025-05-06 04:51 p.m.
you got the log
ian 2025-05-06 04:51 p.m.
Investigative
sinz 2025-05-06 04:51 p.m.
so what is ur ruling @meowiitten
ian 2025-05-06 04:51 p.m.
Investigative
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:52 p.m. 
sinz 2025-05-06 04:52 p.m.
you got the sophie rain fyp
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:52 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:53 p.m.
Go to 0:09
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:53 p.m.
0:07
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:59 p.m.@sinz You’re the guy in the car
meowiitten 2025-05-06 04:59 p.m.
At 0:03 buddy
sadoimpactoAt 0:03 buddy
sinz 2025-05-06 05:04 p.m.@ian uploading mtd
sinz 2025-05-06 05:04 p.m.
on website
sinz 2025-05-06 05:05 p.m.
nvm i dont have perms to
ian 2025-05-06 05:08 p.m.
Ass motion
ian 2025-05-06 05:08 p.m.@meowiitten we will reply probably today but first could you give a ruling for the mtd
ianAss motion
sinz 2025-05-06 05:08 p.m.
ass caselaw finder 
ian 2025-05-06 05:09 p.m.
Duly admitted
sinz 2025-05-06 05:09 p.m.
gotta use lexis or westlaw
sinzgotta use lexis or westlaw
ian 2025-05-06 05:15 p.m.
Are you a law student
ian 2025-05-06 07:14 p.m.
"Clark Financial alleges slander based on Defendant's purported public accusation that Clark Financial “scams clients.”
ian 2025-05-06 07:14 p.m.@meowiitten can I use this at trial as evidence the Defense admits Defendant publicly accused clark financial
ian 2025-05-06 07:14 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-05-06 07:14 p.m.
No
ian 2025-05-06 07:14 p.m.
why
meowiitten 2025-05-06 07:24 p.m.
Because what a lawyer says isn't evidence especially in pretrial
meowiitten 2025-05-06 07:24 p.m.
To the court
meowiitten 2025-05-06 07:24 p.m.
It's just like how a question on examination isn't evidence
meowiitten 2025-05-06 07:24 p.m.
Only the answer is
ian 2025-05-06 07:33 p.m.@meowiitten @sinz
ian 2025-05-06 07:34 p.m.
btw judge u need to file the motion to sever in website so i can file this one
ian 2025-05-06 07:34 p.m.
I filed the mtd response
sinz 2025-05-06 08:28 p.m.
i dont have access to the case on website for some reason
sinzi dont have access to the case on website for some reason
ian 2025-05-06 08:39 p.m.@Brenda
ian 2025-05-06 08:39 p.m.
Brenda will help you she knows how to popple
meowiitten 2025-05-07 02:50 a.m.@krabz Is he banned permanently or no
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-05-07 03:12 a.m.
We are awaiting a final determination (this spans around 8 other people banned as well)
sadoimpactosinz 2025-05-07 12:53 p.m.
when can we expect a answer on the sever motion
sinz 2025-05-07 12:53 p.m.
i dont care if it remains on ur docket but it should he a separate matter
sinz 2025-05-07 12:53 p.m.
be*
sinzwhen can we expect a answer on the sever motion
ian 2025-05-07 02:11 p.m.
Since it'll obviously be done before the 12th who cares
ian 2025-05-07 02:11 p.m.
Its not like there's anything to do before the hearing
sinz 2025-05-09 04:21 p.m.@meowiitten can I get an answer on the motion to sever
sinz 2025-05-09 04:21 p.m.
a ruling*
meowiitten 2025-05-09 04:22 p.m.
Not yet
sadoimpactoNot yet
sinz 2025-05-09 04:25 p.m.
Can I get an extension for responsive pleading
sinz 2025-05-09 04:25 p.m.
for 48 hrs after motion to sever is ruled on
sinzCan I get an extension for responsive pleading
ian 2025-05-09 04:25 p.m.
we object
ian 2025-05-09 04:26 p.m.
the cases aren't severed pending a ruling, so you should proceed as if the motion had been denied if and until it is severed
ian 2025-05-09 04:27 p.m.
there is no need for an extension besides that either, you were watching this channel literally from the moment we created it for the TRO petition and a complaint wasn't even filed, you've had ample time so unless there's another excuse i just cant help but to object
sinzCan I get an extension for responsive pleading
meowiitten 2025-05-09 04:54 p.m.
No
sadoimpactoNo
sinz 2025-05-09 05:03 p.m.
okay
meowiitten 2025-05-09 06:13 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: The motion to sever is DENIED. District Judge sadoimpacto (Entered: 05/09/2025)
@sinz @ian
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:02 p.m.
ian 2025-05-09 06:22 p.m.@meowiitten mtd went first
ian 2025-05-09 06:22 p.m.
Can you rule on it
meowiitten 2025-05-09 06:23 p.m.
Pending
ian 2025-05-09 06:23 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: The motion to dismiss is DENIED. District Judge sadoimpacto (Entered: 05/09/2025)
ian 2025-05-09 06:23 p.m.
Just copy and paste that
ian 2025-05-09 06:23 p.m.
Just copy and paste it ngl
ian 2025-05-09 06:23 p.m.
Ngo
ian 2025-05-09 06:23 p.m.
Ngl
ian 2025-05-09 06:24 p.m.
Ngl
meowiitten 2025-05-09 06:32 p.m.
Buddy
meowiitten 2025-05-09 06:32 p.m.@sinz You’ll update me if he’s perm banned
meowiitten Server2025-05-10 09:59 a.m.
meowiitten 2025-05-10 09:59 a.m.@ian @sinz
ServersadoimpactoClick to see attachment.
ian 2025-05-10 09:59 a.m.
ian 2025-05-10 10:00 a.m.@sinz I think you were supposed to get your client banned not yourself?
ian 2025-05-10 10:01 a.m.@meowiitten we move for emergency disqualification of counsel
ian 2025-05-10 10:01 a.m.
emergency so he doesnt have to be here if there's a hearing (he can't be since he's banned)
ian 2025-05-10 10:27 a.m.@meowiitten can you order him disqualified? The answer is due today and he clearly cant deliver it. otherwise @shy- will be in default and it wouldnt be his fault
ian 2025-05-10 10:28 a.m.
Sick rhyme
meowiitten 2025-05-10 03:21 p.m.
meowiitten 2025-05-10 03:21 p.m.@sinz You are ejected
meowiitten used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-10 03:21 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @sinz from the case channel.
Case Modified
sadoimpactoian 2025-05-10 03:22 p.m.
Great
ian 2025-05-10 03:22 p.m.
So what do we what what
ian 2025-05-10 03:24 p.m.
Is the response deadline the same
meowiitten 2025-05-10 03:38 p.m.@ian Before I get to that
meowiitten 2025-05-10 03:38 p.m.
I'd probably go and talk to moderation and see if you can get your money back that way
meowiitten 2025-05-10 03:38 p.m.
Just tell them what happened
meowiitten 2025-05-10 03:38 p.m.
This issue is unresolvable in roleplay
meowiitten 2025-05-10 03:38 p.m.
And the judge said so as well
meowiitten 2025-05-10 03:38 p.m.
And if they say no then we will try to continue
sadoimpactoAnd if they say no then we will try to continue
ian 2025-05-10 03:39 p.m.
What I'd like to do is first have this court rule he is liable
ian 2025-05-10 03:40 p.m.
If by that time (because this will take time) he is still banned pending an investigation, then we wait until he is absolved (or permanently banned instead)
ian 2025-05-10 03:40 p.m.
And then he'll pay us
ian 2025-05-10 03:40 p.m.
First we need to establish he is liable here though
shy- 2025-05-10 03:52 p.m.
If we are to continue with proceedings, I wish for a extension before proceedings so I can seek appropriate representation.
shy-If we are to continue with proceedings, I wish for a extension before proceedings so I can seek appropriate representation.
ian 2025-05-10 03:53 p.m.
Yes we will continue "with proceedings"
ian 2025-05-10 03:53 p.m.
You don't need leave of court to seek representation so you should already be doing that (since I told you to hours ago)
ian 2025-05-10 03:53 p.m.
If you havent yet looked for representation then we object to an extension
shy- 2025-05-10 03:54 p.m.
I have been seeking representation but it’s particularly hard when you are banned.
shy- 2025-05-10 03:54 p.m.
Something this court fails to realize.
shy-I have been seeking representation but it’s particularly hard when you are banned.
ian 2025-05-10 03:54 p.m.
How is it hard
ianHow is it hard
shy- 2025-05-10 03:54 p.m.
Considering most attorneys require payment, I am unable to pay as once again, banned.
ian 2025-05-10 03:54 p.m.
Right
shy-Considering most attorneys require payment, I am unable to pay as once again, banned.
ian 2025-05-10 03:55 p.m.
Would you say 48 hours more is reasonable
ian 2025-05-10 03:56 p.m.
If so we're ok with that extension, given he will represent himself if he is not able to find a lawyer
ianWould you say 48 hours more is reasonable
shy- 2025-05-10 03:56 p.m.
That’s fine
ian 2025-05-10 03:56 p.m.
Ok
ian 2025-05-10 03:56 p.m.@meowiitten both parties agree a 48 hour extension is reasonable
meowiitten 2025-05-10 03:56 p.m.
ok
ian 2025-05-10 03:56 p.m.
But
ian 2025-05-10 03:56 p.m.
If he doesnt find a lawyer he has to represent himself
ian 2025-05-10 03:56 p.m.
Obviously
ian 2025-05-10 04:03 p.m.
So the answer would be due 20:00 GMT May 12
ian 2025-05-11 02:02 p.m.@meowiitten this is awaiting a ruling
ian 2025-05-11 02:02 p.m.
On the mtd
meowiitten 2025-05-11 02:05 p.m.@shy- Status on your ban?
ian 2025-05-11 02:05 p.m.
Same as before to my knowledge
meowiitten 2025-05-11 02:05 p.m.
I'm asking him
meowiitten 2025-05-11 02:13 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: The motion to dismiss is DENIED. District Judge sadoimpacto (Entered: 05/11/2025)
@ian @shy-
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:02 p.m.
ian 2025-05-11 02:14 p.m.
Thank you your owner
sadoimpactoshy- 2025-05-11 02:21 p.m.
Still being investigated - no response.
ian 2025-05-11 02:28 p.m.@shy- unblock me bruh
ianshy- 2025-05-11 03:14 p.m.
my dms are off :/
shy-my dms are off :/
ian 2025-05-11 03:15 p.m.
add m
ianadd m
shy- 2025-05-11 03:20 p.m.
my friend requests are also off
shy-my friend requests are also off
ian 2025-05-11 03:21 p.m.
send me a request yoursel
ian 2025-05-11 03:21 p.m.
You don't have to but like. I can't communicate with you this way
shy- 2025-05-11 03:21 p.m.
sent
ian 2025-05-11 03:21 p.m.
it's better for both of us not just me if I can
shy- 2025-05-11 03:22 p.m.
Gotta drive send me a dm if you need I’ll respond when I can
ian 2025-05-11 03:23 p.m.
thanks
meowiitten 2025-05-11 06:29 p.m. 
ian 2025-05-12 01:16 p.m.@meowiitten hi
ian 2025-05-12 01:16 p.m.
Answer due tonight
ian 2025-05-12 01:16 p.m.
TRO hearing is now
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:17 p.m.
Well present your argument
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:17 p.m.
Or uh
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:17 p.m.
I mean
ian 2025-05-12 01:17 p.m.
Uhm
ian 2025-05-12 01:17 p.m.
Im plaintiff
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:17 p.m.
I know
ian 2025-05-12 01:17 p.m.
My arguments are in the motion ben would have to fight the arguments and I rebut
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:18 p.m.
You should go first arguing for the PI I’m just waiting on the defendant
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:18 p.m.
I don’t know what his deal is anymore
ian 2025-05-12 01:18 p.m.
He told me he is going pro se
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:18 p.m.@shy- Why did you have to get banned(edited)
ian 2025-05-12 01:18 p.m.
He is going pro se so could you give him the waiver
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:18 p.m.
I’ll just accept it
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:19 p.m.
So go ahead and pretend your argument(edited)
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:19 p.m.
Present
ian 2025-05-12 01:19 p.m.
Ok well
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:19 p.m.
Not pretend
ian 2025-05-12 01:19 p.m.
My argument essentially is
ian 2025-05-12 01:19 p.m.
We know he has this money
meowiitten 2025-05-12 01:19 p.m.
How do you know
ian 2025-05-12 01:19 p.m.
Ok ill continue when im done eating give me a sec
ian 2025-05-12 01:24 p.m.
ok @meowiitten
ian 2025-05-12 01:24 p.m.
we know this because
ian 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
most companies, banks, firms (my firm) have a roblox account created for the purpose of storing that money
ian 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
that they get
ian 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
in our case it's cliffordchancebank
ian 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
this is not the case however
ian 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
for bellco
ian 2025-05-12 01:25 p.m.
but they need to store the money somewhere and ben during his tenure as the owner of bellco decided to just do it on his profile
ian 2025-05-12 01:26 p.m.
after that when ownership was transferred to my client ethan he did not receive any funds
ian 2025-05-12 01:26 p.m.
so we know either he is in possession of these funds or he gave them away in violation of the TRO (or not in violation if he gave them away before it was issued, but still)
ianbut they need to store the money somewhere and ben during his tenure as the owner of bellco decided to just do it on his profile
ian 2025-05-12 01:27 p.m.
we know this because ethan now has access to the books and he can clearly see everything (Everything) shows ben had the funds in his profile
ian 2025-05-12 01:27 p.m.
and I dont think he disputes this
ian 2025-05-12 01:28 p.m.
my client has signed an affidavit stating this is true to the best of his belief
ian 2025-05-12 01:28 p.m.
and his belief should be trusted by this court because he can access the books and he can clearly see who is the actual owner
ian 2025-05-12 01:28 p.m.
as the actual owner*
ian 2025-05-12 01:28 p.m.
who is in possession of the funds
ian 2025-05-12 01:30 p.m.
as such we know he has the funds or should and if we arent given them back because he loses them in some way then bellco will never be able to recover their clients' trust
ian 2025-05-12 01:31 p.m.
“[e]vidence of loss of control over business reputation and damage to goodwill [can] constitute irreparable harm," Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management, Inc. , 736 F.3d 1239, 1250 (9th Cir. 2013)
ian 2025-05-12 01:31 p.m.
it's irreparable harm
ian 2025-05-12 01:31 p.m.
so we will suffer irreparable harm if he loses them
ian 2025-05-12 01:32 p.m.
and we already did suffer irreparable harm because the fact our clients have been deprived of this money means they lose trust in us
ian 2025-05-12 01:32 p.m.
clearly we're in the public interests' side because what kind of public would want to allow people to steal from them and their bank
ian 2025-05-12 01:33 p.m.
we're likely to succeed on the merits bc he clearly did this we have evidence
ian 2025-05-12 01:33 p.m.
the law supports the relief sought obviously and the claim is well articulated in our complaint so that meets the requirement for that
ian 2025-05-12 01:34 p.m.
and lastly the balance of equities tips in our favour. defendant broke the law seriously and harmed my client and its brand incredibly thoroughly to the point it may never be able to recover ever
ian 2025-05-12 01:35 p.m.
also defendant wont suffer at all if the TRO is converted into a PI because this temporary restraint of his conduct is unlikely to cause any legally recognize hardship that actually outweighs the irreparable injuries we face were we to not obtain this relief
ian 2025-05-12 01:35 p.m.
thats all rlly
ian 2025-05-12 01:35 p.m.
from us
ian 2025-05-12 01:35 p.m.
unless ben would like to refute something in which case we will rebut
sadoimpactoshy- 2025-05-12 01:45 p.m.
It wasn’t a choice
ian“[e]vidence of loss of control over business reputation and damage to goodwill [can] constitute irreparable harm," *Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management, ...
shy- 2025-05-12 01:54 p.m.
The harm must be “likely, not just possible.” Id. (quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008)).
ianclearly we're in the public interests' side because what kind of public would want to allow people to steal from them and their bank
shy- 2025-05-12 01:55 p.m.
your clients have already been accused by two individuals of stealing $125,000
shy- 2025-05-12 01:55 p.m.
and that was after i left
shy- 2025-05-12 01:55 p.m.
so
shy- 2025-05-12 01:55 p.m.
your clients arent suffering because ive done the right thing and refunded all the balances
shy-The harm must be “likely, not just possible.” Id. (quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008)).
ian 2025-05-12 01:58 p.m.
would you say it's not likely?
ian 2025-05-12 01:58 p.m.
I'd say it's guaranteed
shy-your clients have already been accused by two individuals of stealing $125,000
ian 2025-05-12 01:58 p.m.
literally completely unrelated to this motion
ian 2025-05-12 01:58 p.m.
I ask you keep it in line with the expectation that you argue against the PI not make some sort of counterclaim for people you do not represent
shy- 2025-05-12 01:59 p.m.
your claiming harm has been done
shy- 2025-05-12 01:59 p.m.
im including that harm has not been done because your clients are commiting fraud
ian 2025-05-12 01:59 p.m.
okay
ian 2025-05-12 01:59 p.m.
prove it
ian 2025-05-12 01:59 p.m.
show whatever evidence you have that we are committing fraud i implore you
ian 2025-05-12 02:00 p.m.
but if it's baseless I will move the court to sanction you
shy- 2025-05-12 02:00 p.m.@meowiitten your honor I'd like to include two pieces of evidence of testimony from two seperate customers of bellco credit union - saying that ethanatx & gamerboy have stolen money from them
ian 2025-05-12 02:00 p.m.
and you're acting as a diligent attorney, mind you, I'd suggest not going into these options as they are of very dangerous nature
shy- 2025-05-12 02:00 p.m.
if youd like i can also ask them to join the court today
shy-if youd like i can also ask them to join the court today
ian 2025-05-12 02:00 p.m.
kind of late for that
ian 2025-05-12 02:00 p.m.
the hearing is now
ian 2025-05-12 02:00 p.m.
i object to them taking the stand, as such (they are not actively present in the discord)
ian 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.
if you want to present whatever evidence we don't object though
shy- 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.
actually they are in the discord
shy- 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.
mb
shy- 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.@Glookz
shy- 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.@Ryli
ian 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.
have you gotten consent from them
ian 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.
have they told you they want to appear
shy- 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.
yes i have
shy- 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.
ive spoken to them about them testifying and they wish to
shy- 2025-05-12 02:01 p.m.
as they are appalled to this abomination
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
on second thought I object to this entirely
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
like
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
this is a hearing on the merits of the TRO
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
you're not making a crossclaim for other people
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
firstly they're not defendants and can't make crossclaims here
shy- 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
its not a crossclaim again, its to prove i am free of wrong doing
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
secondly you can't represent them if they were
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
you're not licensed
shy-its not a crossclaim again, its to prove i am free of wrong doing
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
if you could prove we committed fraud
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
which you can't
shy- 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
your claiming i made defamatory statements about bellco & i'm saying they are true
ian 2025-05-12 02:02 p.m.
that doesn't mean you didn't
shy-your claiming i made defamatory statements about bellco & i'm saying they are true
ian 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
no, i'm not just claiming that
ian 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
read the complaint before appearing bruh 
shy- 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
and also i have 3 witnesses saying your clients commited fraud
ian 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
okay
ian 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
changes nothing
ian 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
and we didn't commit fraud
ian 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
ever
ian 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
this is a hearing so you can contest the TRO becoming a PI
ian 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
so contest it
ian 2025-05-12 02:03 p.m.
what you are suggesting has nothing to do with that
shy-The harm must be “likely, not just possible.” Id. (quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008)).
ian 2025-05-12 02:04 p.m.
that is not at all how you use bluebook by the way
ian 2025-05-12 02:04 p.m.
i dont think thats how any citation whatsoever in the entire world works
ian 2025-05-12 02:04 p.m.@meowiitten please order the defendant to stay in line to the purpose of these proceedings
shy-and also i have 3 witnesses saying your clients commited fraud
meowiitten 2025-05-12 02:06 p.m.
Then the proper avenue is to depose them or present affidavits of this
sadoimpactoThen the proper avenue is to depose them or present affidavits of this
ian 2025-05-12 02:06 p.m.
also
ian 2025-05-12 02:06 p.m.
unless he is claiming us committing fraud (which WE DIDNT) somehow negates his own guilt and our grounds for a TRO
ian 2025-05-12 02:06 p.m.
which is a dumbass claim
ian 2025-05-12 02:07 p.m.
it'd be useless for him to present those witnesses
ian 2025-05-12 02:07 p.m.
he'd effectively be the counsel for plaintiffs in a lawsuit (or crossclaim) against us
ian 2025-05-12 02:08 p.m.
and he is not certified to do that, nor have the people he is naming filed suit with us or are named as defendants that can make crossclaims
ian 2025-05-12 02:08 p.m.
stop this at once
meowiitten 2025-05-12 02:16 p.m.@shy- If you don’t have the money, who does?
shy- 2025-05-12 02:17 p.m.
the customers
shy- 2025-05-12 02:17 p.m.
:/
meowiitten 2025-05-12 02:18 p.m.@shy- Okay… but they’re saying they already accounted for money given to the customers. Where did the rest go?
sadoimpactoshy- 2025-05-12 02:18 p.m.
what other money
shy- 2025-05-12 02:18 p.m.
the only money bellco had was from customers.
shy- 2025-05-12 02:19 p.m.
any other money "bellco" had was from me logging day and night
ian 2025-05-12 02:19 p.m.
your honor we had about 1.385 mil if i remember correctly that he took and didnt give back
ianyour honor we had about 1.385 mil if i remember correctly that he took and didnt give back
shy- 2025-05-12 02:19 p.m.
you guys had 1.2mil. the only reason the 940k hasnt been refunded
shy- 2025-05-12 02:19 p.m.
is because
shy- 2025-05-12 02:19 p.m.
the customer is terminated
shy- 2025-05-12 02:19 p.m.
GONE
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
uhm
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
thats literally our money
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
you cant keep it
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
and also
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
your honor
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
ben "refunded" a lot of the money
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
but he didnt actually go through us, the RIGHTFUL OWNERS of that money
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
he just gave it directly to the people that invested in us
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
which doesnt sound bad
ian 2025-05-12 02:20 p.m.
but like we have literally absolutely zero way to track our money now
shy- 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
your claiming customers lost money
shy- 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
why do YOU want the money
ian 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
firstly because there's records he didnt share and now because we dont know who he reimbursed and who he didnt
shy-why do YOU want the money
ian 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
its our money
ian 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
?
ian 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
the customers gave it to us to take care of it
ian 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
we're a bank
ian 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
the customers indirectly lost money because they wanted to take it out of the bank eventually
shy- 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
they had no contracts proving an account was opened
shy- 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
they just gave it to me
shy- 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
and i gave it back
shy- 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
so
ian 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
you, being the bank
ian 2025-05-12 02:21 p.m.
not the bank anymore
shy- 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
so ergo: money gets refunded to customers
ian 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
it was appropriate at the time it isnt now
shy-so ergo: money gets refunded to customers
ian 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
yes
ian 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
it was
shy- 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
great
ian 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
no one is disputing that
ian 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
its not the customers money though its ours
ian 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
thats what you fail to understand
ianits not the customers money though its ours
shy- 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
.
shy- 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
thats a lie
ian 2025-05-12 02:22 p.m.
sir when customers put money into a bank
ian 2025-05-12 02:23 p.m.
the bank has possession of the money
ian 2025-05-12 02:23 p.m.
under the contractual agreement that the customers can take possessive rights back anytime they please
ian 2025-05-12 02:23 p.m.
but the money in actuality is ours
ian 2025-05-12 02:23 p.m.
and you didnt go thru us
ian 2025-05-12 02:23 p.m.
so we cant know how much you actually gave back
ian 2025-05-12 02:23 p.m.
dick move
ianbut the money in actuality is ours
shy- 2025-05-12 02:24 p.m.
the customers money is theirs
shy- 2025-05-12 02:24 p.m.
its never yours
shy- 2025-05-12 02:24 p.m.
and everybody but one has been refunded
shy- 2025-05-12 02:24 p.m.
and they are disputing your claim
shy- 2025-05-12 02:24 p.m.
they dont want their money given to you
shy- 2025-05-12 02:24 p.m.
or your clients
shy-its never yours
ian 2025-05-12 02:24 p.m.
it is
ian 2025-05-12 02:24 p.m.
tho
shy-and they are disputing your claim
ian 2025-05-12 02:25 p.m.
who is disputing our claim
ian 2025-05-12 02:25 p.m.
show proof
ian 2025-05-12 02:25 p.m.
you're saying somebody said something when i think you never even talked to these guys
ian 2025-05-12 02:25 p.m.
also this is literally a hearing to VACATE THE TRO
ian 2025-05-12 02:25 p.m.
what youre saying has nothing to do with arguing vacatur of the TRO
ian 2025-05-12 02:26 p.m.
like i dont have to answer anything ur saying
ian 2025-05-12 02:26 p.m.
just talk about the tro not being vacated bro its not hard
shy- 2025-05-12 02:26 p.m.@supercoolguyy
ian 2025-05-12 02:26 p.m.
instead you try to make crossclaims on behalf of people u dont represent
ian 2025-05-12 02:26 p.m.
claim we committed fraud
ian 2025-05-12 02:26 p.m.
claim money invested into banks isnt the banks' money
ian 2025-05-12 02:26 p.m.
like
ian 2025-05-12 02:26 p.m.
are you actually going to argue that injunctive relief is inappropriate
shy- 2025-05-12 02:27 p.m.
it is inappropriate
ian 2025-05-12 02:27 p.m.
how
shy- 2025-05-12 02:27 p.m.
im banned.
shy- 2025-05-12 02:27 p.m.
how do you expect me to blow the money
shy- 2025-05-12 02:27 p.m.
its unneccessary.
ian 2025-05-12 02:28 p.m.
dawg
ian 2025-05-12 02:28 p.m.
we went over that
ian 2025-05-12 02:28 p.m.
already
ian 2025-05-12 02:28 p.m.
many moons ago
shy-its unneccessary.
ian 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
youre arguing a lawsuit is unnecessary
ian 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
not the TRO
ian 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
and that was already decided, specifically, by the judge, like a week ago
shy- 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
Shortly after transferring ownership, I was banned from Clark County and no technical ability to "spend" or "move" any Bellco‑linked assets, virtual or real. Because I am locked out, the TRO provides no additional protection.
ian 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
i think it was a week ago actually idk when it was
shy-Shortly after transferring ownership, I was banned from Clark County and no technical ability to "spend" or "move" any Bellco‑linked assets, virtual or real. Because I am locked ou...
ian 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
uhm it does
ian 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
you can be unbanned at any time
ian 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
it's an investigative temporary ban
ian 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
not permanent and certainly not unappealable
ianalso this is literally a hearing to VACATE THE TRO
meowiitten 2025-05-12 02:29 p.m.
This is the hearing to convert it into a PI or vacate it
ian 2025-05-12 02:30 p.m.
yea
meowiitten 2025-05-12 02:30 p.m.
The primary goal is converting it
ian 2025-05-12 02:30 p.m.
i know
ian 2025-05-12 02:30 p.m.
for us its a hearing to convert it into PI
ian 2025-05-12 02:30 p.m.
for him it's a hearing to have it vacated
shy- 2025-05-12 02:31 p.m.
Because no Bellco funds exist in my possession, there is nothing for a PI to preserve. A preliminary injunction would therefore serve no purpose and should be denied under Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc., 568 U.S. 85, 91 (2013).
shy-Because no Bellco funds exist in my possession, there is nothing for a PI to preserve. A preliminary injunction would therefore serve no purpose and should be denied under Already,...
ian 2025-05-12 02:36 p.m.
can you say what Already holds instead of just waiving it like it's supposed to mean something
ian 2025-05-12 02:36 p.m.
I literally dont see how its relevant
ian 2025-05-12 02:37 p.m.
"The question is whether a covenant not to enforce a trademark against a competitor’s existing products and any future “colorable imitations” moots the competitor’s action to have the trademark declared invalid." Id. how is that related at all
ian 2025-05-12 02:38 p.m.@shy-
ian 2025-05-12 02:59 p.m.@meowiitten apparently ben doesnt want to keep going
ian 2025-05-12 02:59 p.m.
he is fully rampant in my dms though
ian 2025-05-12 02:59 p.m.
i request the hearing end
ian 2025-05-12 03:00 p.m.
he has refused to actually mention the validity of the TRO throughout this entire hearing
ian 2025-05-12 03:00 p.m.
instead talking about useless unrelated moints
ian 2025-05-12 03:00 p.m.
points
ian 2025-05-12 03:00 p.m.
thats a good name for a moot point
ian 2025-05-12 03:00 p.m.
moint
ian 2025-05-12 03:00 p.m.
anyways
ian 2025-05-12 03:00 p.m.
yeah we ask you end the hearing here and rule in our favour since ben has literally like not said anything
ian 2025-05-12 03:01 p.m.
just quoted a dumbass precedent that has nothing to do with the case and dipped
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:01 p.m.@shy- What are you doing
ian 2025-05-12 03:06 p.m.@meowiitten ok
ian 2025-05-12 03:07 p.m.
we move to adjourn
ian 2025-05-12 03:07 p.m.
immediately
ian 2025-05-12 03:07 p.m.
this guy added me into a gc with all of bellco's clients and is saying they should sue me
ian 2025-05-12 03:07 p.m.
???
ian 2025-05-12 03:07 p.m.
i need time to figure out what the fuck he is doing and how im gonna reply to it
sadoimpactoshy- 2025-05-12 03:09 p.m.
im driving! what about you?
ian 2025-05-12 03:09 p.m.
no he's not bruh
ianno he's not bruh
shy- 2025-05-12 03:09 p.m.
thats slander
shy- 2025-05-12 03:09 p.m.
ill sue
shy- 2025-05-12 03:10 p.m.
we are using our right to free speech protected under the first amendment
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:14 p.m.
Welp
shy- 2025-05-12 03:18 p.m.
please note that mr ians claims of bellco having assets have officially been resolved - all customers money have been refunded including supercoolguyy
shy- 2025-05-12 03:18 p.m.
:)
shy- 2025-05-12 03:18 p.m.
bye now
shy-please note that mr ians claims of bellco having assets have officially been resolved - all customers money have been refunded including supercoolguyy
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:19 p.m.
???
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:20 p.m.
Refunded by who?
sadoimpactoRefunded by who?
ian 2025-05-12 03:25 p.m.
he alleges he refunded some of the customers
ian 2025-05-12 03:25 p.m.
during a TRO vacatur hearing which has nothing to do with this
ian 2025-05-12 03:25 p.m.
and provides no proof
shy-thats slander
ian 2025-05-12 03:26 p.m.
ianand provides no proof
shy- 2025-05-12 03:31 p.m.
the customers testimony is proof
shy- 2025-05-12 03:31 p.m.
are you saying the customers are lying now?
ian 2025-05-12 03:31 p.m.
There is no testimony
ian 2025-05-12 03:31 p.m.
Do you what testimony means
shy- 2025-05-12 03:31 p.m.
ok then ill have each customer join & ping you and the judge
ian 2025-05-12 03:31 p.m.
Cant
ian 2025-05-12 03:31 p.m.
Its a hearing to vacate the TRO
ian 2025-05-12 03:31 p.m.
Nothing to do with what you're saying
ian 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.@meowiitten this is a joke
ian 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.
End the hearing please
shy- 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.
please do
ian 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.
Ok cool so we agree
ian 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.
PI stays
shy- 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.
this lawyers idiotic behavior is irritating
ianPI stays
shy- 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.
nope
shy- 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.
it doesnt
shy- 2025-05-12 03:32 p.m.
your violating my rights
shy-please do
ian 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.@meowiitten both parties agree to end the hearing and proceed without them arguing against the IP
shy- 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.
you should be disbarred for this behavior
shy- 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.
this is unacceptable
ianshy- 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.
fine end the hearing because im done hearing your stupid mouth
shy- 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.
thank you
shy-fine end the hearing because im done hearing your stupid mouth
ian 2025-05-12 03:33 p.m.
ianshy- 2025-05-12 03:34 p.m.
ian 2025-05-12 03:34 p.m.@meowiitten we respectfully move for sanctions and contempt of court
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.@shy- If you don’t provide individual affidavits from every single one of these customers you “refunded” I am holding you in contempt
sadoimpactoshy- 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.
perfect, how would you like that
shy- 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.
in a pdf or
shy- 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.
i can have each of them message you privately
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.
In a PDF. Each of them must individually sign and attest
sadoimpactoian 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.
He told me to go fuck myself
ian 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.
I am severely offended
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.
Separate PDFs
shy- 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.
perfect can i have until wednesday for this deadline
shy- 2025-05-12 03:35 p.m.
due to the fact customers are in dif time zones
sadoimpactoSeparate PDFs
ian 2025-05-12 03:36 p.m.
Your honor
ian 2025-05-12 03:36 p.m.
We object
ian 2025-05-12 03:36 p.m.
The hearing is over
ian 2025-05-12 03:36 p.m.
He so agreed
ian 2025-05-12 03:36 p.m.
The affidavits would be moot
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:37 p.m.
Overruled
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:37 p.m.
You until Tuesday at 11:59 PM
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:37 p.m.@shy-
shy- 2025-05-12 03:37 p.m.
Thank you!
sadoimpactoYou until Tuesday at 11:59 PM
ian 2025-05-12 03:37 p.m.
We still move for contempt to be entered regardless due to disruptive behavior
ianWe still move for contempt to be entered regardless due to disruptive behavior
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:39 p.m.
Will you let the chess game play out
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:39 p.m.
Jeez
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:40 p.m.
I’m trying to make sure he’s not lying
sadoimpactoWill you let the chess game play out
ian 2025-05-12 03:41 p.m.
During a chess match if an opponent decides to start insulting his opponent and slaps him in the face he would face sanctions
ian 2025-05-12 03:41 p.m.
He is being clearly disruptive here
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:41 p.m.
I said I will handle it
meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:42 p.m.
Now calm yourself
ian 2025-05-12 03:42 p.m.
Ok
shy- 2025-05-12 03:53 p.m.@meowiitten i cannot upload pdfs
shy- 2025-05-12 03:53 p.m.
or any files for that matter
shy-meowiitten 2025-05-12 03:58 p.m.
Do a drive link then
sadoimpactoDo a drive link then
shy- 2025-05-12 03:58 p.m.
ok
shy- 2025-05-12 03:59 p.m.AFFIDAVIT OF PAYMENT RECEIPT State of Mayflower County of Lander ss.: I, supercoolguyy, being duly sworn, depose and say: 2. Background. On May 3, 2025~I entered into a written Payment Agreement~with TheBenBurnley ~under which Ben agreed to pay me Nine Hundred Forty Thousand U.S. Dollar... 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18jOhOwAhWlN65sn-GT-iUUmL7gKrro8VvHGsnOp6suw/edit?usp=sharing
cc:@ian , @meowiitten
cc:
shy-ian 2025-05-12 04:02 p.m.
Is this it
ianIs this it
shy- 2025-05-12 04:03 p.m.
no theres more
shy- 2025-05-12 04:03 p.m.
they all live overseas though so
shy- 2025-05-12 04:03 p.m.
(rest of the customers)
ian 2025-05-12 04:03 p.m.
You should upload all at once
ian 2025-05-12 05:23 p.m.@shy- courtesy—deadline for your answer is tonight
ian 2025-05-12 05:23 p.m.
cc @meowiitten
shy- 2025-05-12 05:57 p.m.
answer for
shy-answer for
ian 2025-05-12 06:11 p.m.
complaint see pinned messages
shy- 2025-05-12 06:16 p.m.
i object
shy- 2025-05-12 06:16 p.m.
it’s unnecessary
shy- 2025-05-12 06:19 p.m.
and this matter should be dropped as once again im banned
shy- 2025-05-12 08:46 p.m.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1kPRu07D8irWQrK_bqEr4EJQn4pRQdXpA
cc:@ian , @meowiitten
cc:
shy-https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1kPRu07D8irWQrK_bqEr4EJQn4pRQdXpA cc: @ian , @meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
Put them all as PDFs into filing-center
meowiitten 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
PDF file
meowiitten 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
Not drive
shy-https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1kPRu07D8irWQrK_bqEr4EJQn4pRQdXpA cc: @ian , @meowiitten
ian 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
objection
ian 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
it's one minute late
ian 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
we motion for default
shy- 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
he said tuesday at 11:59
shy- 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
its monday & 8:48.
ian 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
no, he didnt
ian 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
it's due tonight
sadoimpactoYou until Tuesday at 11:59 PM
shy- 2025-05-12 08:48 p.m.
^
ian 2025-05-12 08:49 p.m.
1 minute ago
ian 2025-05-12 08:49 p.m.
that's not for the answer
ian 2025-05-12 08:49 p.m.
that's for something else
ian 2025-05-12 08:49 p.m.
oh wait
ian 2025-05-12 08:49 p.m.
nevermind withdrawn
ian 2025-05-12 08:49 p.m.
sorry
shy- 2025-05-12 08:49 p.m.
fine i agree to the TRO
shy- 2025-05-12 08:49 p.m.
anything to make you shush
shy-fine i agree to the TRO
ian 2025-05-12 08:49 p.m.@meowiitten woohoo!
ian 2025-05-12 08:50 p.m.PLAINTIFF DEFAULT JUDGMENT PACKAGE AND MOTION
Cc@meowiitten
Courtesy Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dq0U0mUdnW-m38Wm_3WTwP_SwxML6lKn/view?usp=sharing
ian 2025-05-12 08:51 p.m.
Filed
shy- 2025-05-12 08:51 p.m.
exactly why are you filing for default this time
shy- 2025-05-12 08:51 p.m.
my goodness
shy-exactly why are you filing for default this time
ian 2025-05-12 08:51 p.m.
this time?
ian 2025-05-12 08:51 p.m.
This is the only motion for default I've submitted
ianThis is the only motion for default I've submitted
shy- 2025-05-12 08:51 p.m.
and why are you filing it
ian 2025-05-12 08:51 p.m.
read it and you'll see
shy- 2025-05-12 08:52 p.m.
pleading to what
shy- 2025-05-12 08:52 p.m.
also where are you getting 48 hours extra. today marks 7 days
shy- 2025-05-12 08:52 p.m.
lol
shy-also where are you getting 48 hours extra. today marks 7 days
ian 2025-05-12 08:53 p.m.
civil rules of procedure gives 5 days
ian 2025-05-12 08:53 p.m.
you were given 48 hours extra—an extension
iancivil rules of procedure gives 5 days
shy- 2025-05-12 08:53 p.m.
and exactly what was i supposed to respond to
iancomplaint see pinned messages
ian 2025-05-12 08:53 p.m.
^
ian 2025-05-12 08:53 p.m.
i told you about this a few hours ago u didnt listen
shy- 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
ok then file for default
ian 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
yea i did
shy- 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
have fun tf
ian 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
also im decently sure i told you about it in dms at some point
shy- 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
good for you
shy-have fun tf
ian 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
default means the court just does what we ask
ian 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
because you failed to contest our claims
shy- 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
ok you guys fired my lawyet
shy- 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
lawyer
shy- 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
:/
shy- 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
and also
shy- 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
im BANNED
ian 2025-05-12 08:54 p.m.
he got removed from the community lmao
shy- 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
if you people cant get that through all your heads then i guess you all need some type of psycho therapy
shy-im BANNED
ian 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
motion for dismissal
ian 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
dont you know how
ian 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
youre pro se
shy- 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
that was already filed
shy- 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
the judge denied it
shy- 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
lma
ian 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
yea and denied so its pointless
ian 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
you could settle with me
shy- 2025-05-12 08:55 p.m.
this is an intimidation tactic
ian 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
call it what you want
ian 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
it's legal
ian 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
and ethical
shy- 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
and its legal to tell you to shove it up your ass to
shy- 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
if we are going legal
ian 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
yes
ian 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
would you like to do that
ian 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
i can bend over
shy- 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
ew
ian 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
you'll still be in default though
shy- 2025-05-12 08:56 p.m.
power hungry small dicked wanna be
ian 2025-05-12 08:57 p.m.
i assure you i am NOT a small dick wannabe
ian 2025-05-12 08:57 p.m.
that would imply i want to have a small dick
ianyou'll still be in default though
shy- 2025-05-12 08:57 p.m.
and ill be protesting against your law office
ian 2025-05-12 08:57 p.m.
and i don't want to but unfortunately i already do
shy- 2025-05-12 08:57 p.m.
and you specifically
shy-and ill be protesting against your law office
ian 2025-05-12 08:57 p.m.
that's fine..
shy- 2025-05-12 08:57 p.m.
funny how its already being sued
shy- 2025-05-12 09:04 p.m.@meowiitten its been put in filing-center
ianthat's fine..
shy- 2025-05-12 09:07 p.m.
and even if you do win - im never grinding again
shy- 2025-05-12 09:07 p.m.
so
shy-ian 2025-05-12 09:09 p.m.
Not where it goes
ian 2025-05-12 09:09 p.m.
That's been discontinued
ian 2025-05-12 09:09 p.m.
Do it on the website
ian 2025-05-12 09:10 p.m.
shy- 2025-05-12 09:10 p.m.
he said filing center
shy- 2025-05-12 09:11 p.m.
im not navigating the website
sadoimpactoPut them all as PDFs into filing-center
shy- 2025-05-12 09:11 p.m.
^
ian 2025-05-12 09:14 p.m.
Oh ok
ian 2025-05-12 09:14 p.m.@meowiitten are you sure
ian 2025-05-12 09:14 p.m.
This case was filed post website
shy- 2025-05-12 09:20 p.m.@meowiitten Your Honor, Myself & @ian have came up with a settlement to settle outside of court. Please hold off on the signing of default.
shy-ian 2025-05-12 09:21 p.m.
Uhm your honor this is completely false
ian 2025-05-12 09:21 p.m.
HA just fucking with you
ian 2025-05-12 09:21 p.m.
Yes this is true
ian 2025-05-12 09:21 p.m.
It will be done most likely by tomorrow until then pls dont do anything
meowiitten 2025-05-14 08:39 p.m.@ian @shy- Well?
sadoimpactoian 2025-05-14 08:59 p.m.
I'm waiting on one of my clients to sign the agreement so I can send it to the Defendant
ian 2025-05-14 09:00 p.m.
Once that's done we will voluntarily dismiss through notice of dismissal
ian 2025-05-14 09:00 p.m.
We won't provide the agreement for the court though as it's not required
ian 2025-05-15 05:27 p.m.@meowiitten the Parties have agreed to a settlement
ian 2025-05-15 05:27 p.m.
This serves as formal notice of dismissal by the plaintiffs
ian 2025-05-15 05:27 p.m.
Thank you Judge
ianmeowiitten 2025-05-15 05:34 p.m.
You have to disclose the settlement to me
meowiitten 2025-05-15 05:34 p.m.
And it has to be a written joint stipulation of dismissal
sadoimpactoYou have to disclose the settlement to me
ian 2025-05-15 05:34 p.m.
Not according to the rules of civil procedure if I remember correctly
ian 2025-05-15 05:35 p.m.
We want to keep the settlement agreement private
ianWe want to keep the settlement agreement private
meowiitten 2025-05-15 05:42 p.m.
What I mean is you have to disclose that you reached a settlement by filing the joint stipulation of dismissal
ian 2025-05-15 05:43 p.m.
My understanding is "[e]xcept in actions in which property has been seized [...] a claim, or any part of an action or claim may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court[.]"
ian 2025-05-15 05:43 p.m.
Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 31(a)(1)
meowiitten 2025-05-15 05:43 p.m.
Read the first half
meowiitten 2025-05-15 05:44 p.m.
Property meaning money/deposits
ian 2025-05-15 05:44 p.m.
the TRO?
meowiitten 2025-05-15 05:44 p.m.
Are you playing dumb
meowiitten 2025-05-15 05:44 p.m.
This whole case is about seized assets
meowiitten 2025-05-15 05:45 p.m.
File the joint stipulation or I’m not dismissing
meowiitten 2025-05-15 05:45 p.m.
End of story
ian 2025-05-15 05:45 p.m.
Ok
ian 2025-05-15 05:46 p.m.
I'll see if I can file it today
ian 2025-05-15 05:48 p.m.@meowiitten the injunction is vacated immediately upon dismissal I presume
meowiitten 2025-05-15 05:50 p.m.
Yes
shy- 2025-05-15 06:05 p.m.
I, TheBenBurnley, do agree to stipulate to a dismissal in CV-184-25 and hereby allow npz_v to sign such a document on my behalf.
shy- 2025-05-15 06:07 p.m.@meowiitten
shy-I, TheBenBurnley, do agree to stipulate to a dismissal in CV-184-25 and hereby allow npz_v to sign such a document on my behalf.
ian 2025-05-15 06:33 p.m.
You werent supposed to send that here
ian 2025-05-15 06:33 p.m.
hahahahahahah
ian 2025-05-15 06:33 p.m.
hahahahahahahh
shy- 2025-05-15 06:34 p.m.
vhatgpt
ianshy- 2025-05-15 06:34 p.m.
me rn
ian 2025-05-15 06:35 p.m.
quick! flood the chat with random gifs before it's archived!
meowiitten 2025-05-15 06:37 p.m.PAPERLESS ORDER: The above-captioned matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. District Judge sadoimpacto (Entered: 05/15/2025)
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:02 p.m.
meowiitten used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-15 06:37 p.m.
Creating transcript..
meowiitten used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-15 06:38 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @shy- from the case channel.
Case Modified
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-15 06:38 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1372704618160586854 Successfully created transcript.
meowiitten used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-15 06:38 p.m. @meowiitten has removed @ian from the case channel.
Case Modified
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-15 06:38 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1372704621973209219 Successfully created transcript.
meowiitten 2025-05-15 06:38 p.m.@Prothonotary's Office Archive!
Exported 1125 messages